In the years before his conversion to Christianity, St Augustine of Hippo is quoted as having prayed: please make me virtuous but not yet. Similarly, many of us want to be better leaders but won't invest the effort and energy necessary to shift how we operate. So, let's check other areas in which we've all changed in recent years - and contrast these with how (if at all) we've upgraded how we lead those we rely on for the success of our projects.
Social networking sites and TV screens have been alight and aTwitter in recent times with voters rampaging through Teheran, Shiraz and Isfahan. These historic cities have been host to massive leadership disaffection and revolt against an apparently rigged appointment. Such disturbances have few parallels in business life. But, many appointments cause concern; and, often leaders lack full support. If we polled your team, how would you rate? What are early warning signs you should watch for?
Team leaders split their time between "leading" and "doing". But daily pressures (particularly now) drag leaders towards the latter: getting things delivered, resolving technical challenges, responding to HO demands, and keeping the admin. flowing. Too often, they stop leading; and, become managers at best or merely operatives at worst. Sounds familiar?
Nancy Mitford's novel ("Love in a Cold Climate" - dealing with British high society after the Second World War) is not serious reading. But its title is apt for one of today's most serious leadership issues: making staff feel valued and cared for. So, what have you been doing? If asked, would your people report feeling important to the future of your business? Would they say you care about their well-being and challenges - at work and in their personal lives?
Hands up anyone who wants to be a business leader today! No-one? I'm not surprised. If you run a big organisation (particularly in financial services), you're clearly a crook. If it's a small business, the banks won't roll your loans. And in between, you're still a dirty capitalist; and, surrounded by staff fearful for their jobs; and, with customers who've probably already opened the window and jumped. So, what's your leadership strategy going to be?
Check out these quotes! "Your planning process is superb." It's "excellent ... a very simple but very effective management tool." And, the resource material is "the best stuff I've seen." Yes, I'm showing off. These three recent comments refer to our online Leadership-Action-Planning tool. And, they're from: the CEO of a web-based business; the local head of a global investment bank; and, the CEO of a specialist insurance business. Sounds good. But, we're still struggling for uptake. So, how's your own (product and process)
innovation? In tough times, innovation's key. But, it comes with challenges. So, let's review the lessons.
Let's start with two fundamentals. First, what's the only thing a leader must have? Yes, followers! People willing and committed to do what's needed. Second, how are people feeling these days? Happy and assured? Not the ones I know. More like: frightened for their jobs; concerned about mortgages; worried for parents about to retire. So, how do you need to lead, if you want these people to follow?
An article in The Economist (October 5, 2006)* highlights the value of "brainpower (both natural and trained) and especially the ability to think creatively." It states that "the value of 'intangible' assets - everything from skilled workers to patents to know-how - has ballooned (since 1980) from 20% of the value of companies in the S&P 500 to 70% today." Also that "the proportion of American workers doing jobs that call for complex skills has grown three times as fast as employment in general."
Speaking of the Battle of Britain, Winston Churchill immortalised the heroic few, whose bravery saved the lives of many. History is full of similar (but often less upbeat) stories. One that comes to mind is the WWI landing at ANZAC Cove in Turkey, where bungling by Churchill and other leaders left a small contingent of Commonwealth troops outnumbered and under-resourced. Many died in attempting the job they'd been given. In terms of your own leadership (particularly in the current downturn), what would your people say about your provisioning and support - in the context of what you've asked them to do?
Warren Buffett famously quipped that it's not until the tide goes out you find who's been swimming naked. He was referring to financial risk-takers. But, he might as well be talking about leaders. With the tide rising, we all look fine. But with the lake sucked dry, we may be caught. So, as you stand in front of your team today, do they see you clad - or threadbare? Are there holes where it's better to be covered?
Today, businesses and jobs are under threat. Life's tough. People are frightened and distracted. Sound familiar? But what about tomorrow's opportunity? Getting revenue, productivity and profits rising again. What would that take? From my experience, the key is leading your people more effectively. Nothing has greater leverage! It's up to you to stop the depressing and downbeat news from outside eroding workplace commitment and enthusiasm. And, how would your people say you're doing on this? Not well, OK or great?
Committees are often the worst way to get things done. Particularly in nervous times. And, the pre-G20 vibes were net nervous. There was positive energy (particularly from Barack Obama) about working together to restore financial and economic vitality. But, from others, finger-pointing - for example, at bankers and, more generally, those with "blue eyes". And, insistence (from Nicolas Sarkozy) that it would be his solution or none - with a walk-out threatened for good measure. And, as always, cries for legislation and regulation - noisily slamming stable doors after the credits have bolted. Sadly, it's often no different in business. When things go bad, there can be a rush to blaming - and backside covering. Also, pushing personal solutions. So, how have you and your people behaved in the downturn?
What do Kim Jong-il, Margaret Thatcher, Bill Clinton, Carly Fiorina, Dick Fuld, Lakshmi Mittal and Conrad Black have in common. Yes, fame (or infamy). But, not necessarily life stories. For me, the link is their role as potential exemplars in the debate about leadership being either the result of "nature" or of "nurture". "Nature" being about genes, family and early life; "nurture" about job experience and training. So, which is the dominant driver of your leadership approach?
Dramatic economic downturns inflict pain both widely and deeply. People lose their jobs, homes and self-worth. No wonder they join in seeking scapegoats. Tearing into Bernard (Ponzi) Madoff in America or Fred (the Shred) Goodwin in Europe deflects our own pain. But, as a leader, how much time do you spend reviewing your own responsibility for what you've experienced recently - for your own organisational and systemic failures?
As Sam Wanamaker famously said: I know that half of my advertising dollars are wasted ... I just don't know which half. He might equally be talking about leadership training and development. Checking Amazon, I find they have over three hundred thousand titles under "leadership". And, how many have you read? Or should you? Perhaps two or three! The key test: does this one give me a tool to diagnose what my team needs from me, in their current circumstances and facing their particular challenges. Anything else leaves you reliant on theory or anecdote. As a leader, you practice a craft: customising your leadership actions. Not borrowing, copying or mass-producing! And, the output has to be a personal Leadership Action Plan. So, how would such a tool look? And, what does it need to do?
The US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, hasn't asked my advice. But, he looks as though he needs some. He's like a stalled driver on a railway crossing and the runaway financial express is already on top of him. His lack of resolve is worrying both Americans and investors across the world. Obama's land of "hope" and "yes, we can" is at risk of becoming a desert of "nope". Many CFOs (and their CEOs) face similar challenges - albeit smaller. So, how are you going? Perhaps this advice may be of help to you as well!
Richard Wagner's Ring Cycle ends with Valhalla, the lofty abode of the gods, collapsing in flames into the rising tide of the River Rhine below. And the stolen gold, whose theft triggered the gods' downfall, sinks beneath the flood back into the hands of its rightful owners, the Rhine Maidens. It takes 15 hours (and four operas) to tell this story. And, it's all rather reminiscent of the recent boom and bust of the global financial system. Pride, dishonesty and rejection of basic good sense. So, how in our new and darker world of business leadership should we all behave?
Let's start with two anecdotes. First: I was recently talking with a client, with whom I've done business strategy work and who's keen to try our Leadership Action Planning tool for himself and his team. Notwithstanding current conditions, their business is growing and profitable. It's well-run and operates in an online retail space that's gaining market share. But, he's initiated cautionary cost-cutting; and, is wary of starting a leadership program at this time, even though he recognises its merit and its relative cheapness (given it's also online).
High (often unreasonable) expectations await newly appointed presidents - whether taking the helm of a company or a country. For President Obama, this is multiplied manyfold. His personal story, and the dreams it creates for others, breaks hugely with the past. And, he steps up in the face of challenges of hurricane proportions. How will he go? Sadly, if his current economic and financial initiatives fail, the dreams of many may end almost before they're born. So, let's take stock of your leadership (of your team, project or business): how difficult are things going forward? And, what the hell are you doing about them?
The Brookings Institution claims the US gains 300,000 jobs for each one percent increase in broadband penetration. And, two European consultancies see 2m new jobs by 2015 from increased broadband access*. That's the good news. But, what about the bad? What's the upside (and downside) of broadband for your leadership - and your job?
Do the math. Ericsson, Microsoft, UBS and BHP (to mention just four global companies) are each retrenching thousands of workers. Unemployment in New York is rising at the "fastest pace on record". Job losses in Singapore may "triple in 2009". Small businesses are closing in every Main Street. Across the globe, millions of people are losing their jobs. And, for every ten workers, one leadership position disappears as well. So, what are you doing to be sure you're not the next leader without a role?
Whether you're President Obama or the leader of China, France or any other country, you’re currently struggling to craft or manage a stimulus package that’s both effective and efficient. Effective in creating growth and jobs; efficient in doing so without waste. There’s no point giving money that isn’t spent, gets into the wrong hands or takes years to impact. OK, but what about your personal stimulus package? In these times of retrenchments and cut-throat competition, what are you doing (and investing) to grow as a leader and keep your job?
Manfred Kets de Vries, creator of GELI (the Global Executive Leadership Inventory), is a leading leadership thinker. He's teased out the so-called "soft" human aspect of leadership. But, this aspect is actually the "hard" one: more complex; and less trainable. And, that said, I think his GELI could do with more gelatine!
Every year's different. But, 2009 looks like being really different. For many, the most challenging year ever. So, let's cut to the chase: as you return to work, which of your stakeholders is most frightened - in relation to their dealings with you and your business? Is it customers, employees, suppliers or, perhaps, your bankers? And, what are you going to do to ensure they don't abandon you?
If you were putting together a football team, would you select only people, who play the same position? Probably not. But, that’s what we often do with business teams. No, let's not ask Jenny, she's rather different, and she's not an engineer; and, Fred, he’s only interested in sales. We don’t want anyone who rocks the boat – in other words, with different or confronting views.
Carlos Ghosn, global head of Renault Nissan, talks up "frugal engineering". He sees it as key to delivering affordable cars in emerging economies like China and India. But, what does he mean? And, by extension, what would "frugal leadership" be?
Think of your favourite sporting figure! Who's their coach? Call to mind how they watch each play or shot – then gently (often almost invisibly) send a message: to relax, focus, push harder or whatever’s necessary. It's powerful stuff.
School teachers often teach - and, therefore, have to lead - students of a common age. But, most of us lead teams covering a range of ages. So, why the fixation with the leadership needs of Generation X or Y, or any other letter of the alphabet? An effective leader engages people of all ages - and types. And, I'll bet X and Y are as diverse as any group.
Times are tough - economically, but also psychologically. Calls to a national executive counselling service are up 25% year-on-year, according to a report I read today. And, training and development budgets are getting the chop. We're all under pressure: to maintain business performance, cut costs and hold our jobs. There’s no easy answer, but being smart beats being depressed.
In 1997, Don Tapscott published "Growing up digital" - and coined the name "net generation" for the natives of the online world. Now 11 years on, and after a two-year survey of 8,000 people (born 1978 to 1994) from across 12 countries, he's published "Grown up digital". He concludes that on average Net Geners are smarter, quicker and more tolerant of diversity than the decrepit oldies like the Baby Boomers, let alone the dodos like me, familiarly known as Veterans.
What's the leadership equivalent of reaching for your Swiss Army Knife, and selecting the right blade? It's creating a plan, and populating it with appropriate leadership actions. Actions relevant to current challenges, not old ones. Actions that convince people and build commitment. Things that work, giving traction in this tough new environment.
As President-elect, three of Barack Obama's earliest appointments have been: Treasury secretary (Timothy Geithner); Director, National Economic Council (Lawrence Summers); and Director, Council of Economic Advisers (Christina Romer) . Why these roles, and why so quickly?
V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership® is an online leadership action-planning tool. It helps you do two things: first, diagnose what your colleagues need you to do, if they're going to follow and support you; and second, turn this into a plan. Sounds simple - but it's not often done. The cost: as little as $75 - and you can update your plan, email it and access lots of resource material. It's certainly new, and we believe unique.
As children, we learnt about rewards. We got dessert, if we finished our spinach. We went to the fair, if our rooms were tidy. It's not surprising therefore that as adults, incentives still work for most of us.
You won't become famous by being efficient. It’s too mechanical. But leaders are brought down by the opposite. Inefficiency is something your detractors can point to. It annoys – and offends – people. No one likes their time being wasted.
If you can’t keep up, you're part of the problem not the solution. And, this is true for leaders, as for anyone else. If you don't understand how your business works today – the market trends, new technologies, economic drivers and so on – then, people won't want to follow you. As in a primitive tribe, they’ll leave you to die.
Benchmarking and intellectual property are modern buzzwords. No business plan or conference is complete without them. But, as with all jargon, they're more talked of than seriously applied. Why? Because, application is hard work. And, benchmarking leads to comparing my company, division or team with others. And, that's potentially embarrassing. So, let's talk but perhaps not do too much.
The Sage of Omaha, Warren Buffett, says the downturn is going to be both deep and long. Global central banks have caught the falling knife of financial collapse. But, there's blood (and shredded reputations) on the floor. And now, the real economy is in for a bad time. Customers are already delaying purchases; banks are loathe to lend - even to good businesses; and, no-one knows what the next fright will be.
Without profit, cash dries up, investment stops and the business fails. For CEOs, profitability and its supporting measures, such as cash flow and return on investment, are a constant focus. They’re the business's vital signs: corporate blood count and heart rate. And, particularly important for small businesses with thinner reserves.
The legendary King Midas had a special gift. Everything he touched turned to gold. Sounds great, but it wasn’t good for his diet - and he died. However today, having the "Midas touch" means the ability to make money. And, many business leaders have this special skill. They smell what's profitable and what's not.
I've got clients I've worked with for decades. This may reflect badly on their judgement. But, for me, it’s a source of great pleasure. I understand them and their organisation; and, how they think; what they value; when to listen and when to talk; and, in some cases, when to shout. This enables me to add greater value.
Nature abhors a vacuum. Particularly, an information blackout. And, if you let one arise, it may quickly fill with "good stories" put about by competitors and enemies.
Which do you prefer: an afternoon at the football; or, an evening at the symphony? Either way, you'll see teamwork in action. And, perhaps that's the reason so many highly effective leaders have experience of team sports or other team activities.
I use taxis a lot. On rare occasions, I step in and am immediately struck by the cleanliness and polish, the smooth running engine, and the useful gadgets the owner has added. He or she is normally very polite and clearly proud of their chariot. And, such cabs instead of aging tend to get better with time.
In a recent leadership survey, respondents told me their most common problem was dealing with difficult employees. People, who for one reason or another, didn't want to sign-on, cooperate or pull their weight. This is interesting, since the only thing a leader has to have is followers. So, if any are opting out, then I’m not a leader. At least, for them. Hands up if you’ve ever had this problem! I have, and all too often.
Alexander the Great is one of history's great leaders. Two thousand years ago, at the head of his Macedonian army, he unified Greece. And, then led a combined army to conquer their ancient enemy, the Persians. The objectives were clear and it all made sense for his generals and troops. However, after four years, he was still dragging them eastward - arriving eventually in northern India. But, his army no longer cared. Alexander was forced to turn back.
We've all done it: rushed to the shops and come back without something. And, there's always a reason: someone distracted us, or the phone rang. But, the real reason is we didn't have a list. That simplest of plans.
Our skeleton provides the structure for our body. Without it, we’d be a wobbly heap of flesh on the floor. The same is true for organisations. If the structure isn't clear, it's hard to make things hold together. What am I responsible for? Who's my boss? Who are my peers? Who are the subordinates I'm responsible for? These are amongst the first questions we ask in relation to a new job.
When I pass a mirror, I often check how I look. Vanity? Probably. Yet, it may tell me to straighten my tie or tidy my hair. But, what I need more than a snapshot of my appearance is a mirror showing me how I behave; and, its impact on others.
New ways often bring new words; or reinvigorate old ones. "Betterment" is a case of the latter - and something every leader must deliver. A strategic rethink may set a whole new direction for your business. However, between these major shifts, there's lots of room for innovation and upgrades. That's betterment.
General Motors was once a paragon of American business. It's now in serious decline. Its plight illustrates what a famous economist called “creative destruction.” New industries, products and services rise to prominence; but, later lose their traction. Horse-drawn carriages gave way to automobiles - ushering in gas stations but destroying buggy-whip manufacturers. Gas guzzlers had their time on the road, but were overtaken by energy-efficient compacts. And now hybrids; and, so on.
We've all seen the graph. Starting low at the left, it rises little over the centuries. Then, in the last hundred years, begins to rise at an alarming rate. And today, climbs almost vertically – whether plotting the number of patents, the sale of mobile phones or the growth of online commerce.
We all believe in honesty. And, for most of us, this disbars stealing from colleagues or our employer. But, what about failing to pull our weight on a team project or using work time to pursue personal interests? We've all done it. And, in that sense, I haven't always been honest. And, that's possibly true for most of us.
The chameleon lizard changes colour with its environment. As a leader, you have to do much more. When the world changes, you have to transform your organisation and how it operates. Otherwise, it may fail. And, to start the organisational change, you have to change. New situations bring new leadership challenges.
It's lovely to sit and dream: imagining a better future. But, it takes energy to work out how this might be achieved; and, the real work begins when you have to start organising and implementing.
When did you last reprioritise your diary? But that's the easy part. When did you actually
stop doing something? Dropped, finished, gone! That's the tough one.
For many small business owners, survival is an ever-present issue. There are so many challenges. Finding customers. Delivering the product or service. Holding good staff. Managing cash and so much else. What's the key? To staying afloat - and, more importantly, growing and succeeding?
Talk to any soldier and they'll tell you it's frontline troops, not generals, who fight the battles. HQ may set direction and define key goals but it's platoon leaders and their troops, who go there. They're the ones, who reconnoitre, take territory, dig in and fight. Now, business isn't warfare. But, the metaphor has its place.
My father had an engineering business - making furnaces and other products. And, I worked summers in factories, while studying engineering. So, I love that hot, noisy world of clanging metal as it's formed and worked with presses and punches.
Action is the language of leadership. As elsewhere in life, it's what you do that counts. Yes, you need to meet with people and talk a lot. But, the bottom line is "walking the talk." Action, not theory.
Why do organisations fail? Or, succeed? Breakthrough technology may help. So can low-cost production. Or, superb marketing. But behind all this, one finds leadership. Whether it's Murdoch, Gates or Mittal driving growth and achievement; or, Wagoner, Lay or others causing their companies to stumble. But, their's are huge global businesses.
Think of the all-time favourite stories. Many describe a heroic journey: a man or woman leading colleagues in pursuit of an exciting goal. In comparison, being a leader in business is not usually heroic. You don’t have to fight dragons or dive to the bottom of the sea. However, as leader of any team, you share one thing in common with the legendary leaders. There’s no journey, if people won’t follow.
Jack Welch, Carly Fiorina, Warren Buffett! These are the centrefold players, big-ticket stars, the leadership fashion models. We read their names in leadership articles. Why? Big names sell subscriptions. But, the Fortune 500 companies employ just 500 chief executives. So, what about the rest of us, with names like yours and mine, that most people never hear?
To understand Italian opera, you only need five words - or, so they say. Here's the list: morte (death), amore (love), maledizione (curse), adio (farewell) and andiamo (let's go). Supposedly, these will guide you through any romantic tale.
How was your last leadership performance review? And, feedback from colleagues? Was the employee survey result less positive than you'd like?
What's the secret to being chosen? Sadly, there's no one answer. But there are sensible pointers. The right experience and qualification; presenting well; and, writing a good resumé. But years of experience (as both an executive and consultant) tell me the acid test is record of consistently delivering results.
Think of big corporate disasters you've known or read about. What was the cause? Bad strategy, wrong business model, inefficiency, bad luck? Not in my experience. Most often, the core issue is flawed human beings - and, at the top.
Are you a leader or a manager? And, what's the difference? For me, the distinction is one of degree not kind. Most managers spend time leading; and, leaders also manage.
There are times when we stretch ourselves to breaking point. On top of our regular commitments, a parent gets ill, a child’s in trouble, a project goes pear-shaped. For short periods, it’s possible. We push to extreme; then, re-balance.
Throw out all those books on leadership, and the pile of articles on your desk! Reading what other leaders do (or recommend) is like going to the movies or watching TV. It’s entertainment. Sometimes inspiring but mostly irrelevant - and soon forgotten. Most of us don’t need to be General Patton or Rupert Murdoch. We just need to lead that team we see, talk and do things with every day at work.
The article "Building a Leadership Brand" (HBR July/August 2007) is excellent. Assuming, that is, you’re a CEO or HR strategist in a major global corporation. In other words, a few hundred people. But, what about the rest of us: working in smaller organisations, or leading our own businesses? And, worrying daily about delivering products and services, dealing with staff and hoping to improve productivity and profits?
The article, "The Making of an Expert" (HBR July-August 2007), is worth reading if only for one line: experts are always made, not born. And, as the authors stress, this is as true for business leaders as sportspeople, scientists and artists. But how? Years of "practicing intensively"; focusing on "tasks beyond your current level of competence and comfort"; and, having a coach not only to guide you but "help you learn how to coach yourself."
"How Successful Leaders Think" is a classic HBR article: big-name leaders (yes, Jack Welch is there), a handful of anecdotes (passing for evidence), a strong metaphor (we can all understand) and a simple diagram. A revolutionary idea and leadership made easy. Except that the core "opposable" thinking (thesis/antithesis/synthesis) is as old as time, as is also the CEO’s unique integrative role across conflicting needs of individual business units, functions and market groups. But, above all, leadership is about much more than thinking.
"Discovering Your Authentic Leadership" (Harvard Business Review, February 2007) is like a 20-minute, personal-growth workshop. All the feel-good, righteous stuff is there. You should be self-aware and authentic. Don't try to be like anyone else. Find your own life story and build on that. Ensure you've got life balance. Well, all that's fine so long as it finds you on parade and taking leadership actions others will esteem and follow. And, in this regard, my experience (from three decades of consulting and leading) says there are other factors as well. Like being passionate and driven, market savvy, technically proficient, tireless in the service of your team and, yes, at times even angry and unfair. Generals Patton, Napoleon and Wellington weren't heavily into self-awareness. Nor are many CEOs – including ones I've known and admired. Nice is certainly valuable, but not sufficient.
People love lists of dos and don’ts. And, why not? They often contain useful hints. And, a good example is Stadler’s article “The Four Principles of Enduring Success” (HBR July/August 2007). He follows in the footsteps of others like Jim Collins (of Built to Last and Good to Great), who analyse the performance of lots of companies and draw simple conclusions to explain why some excel and others fall behind.
At university, a friend decided to compete in the Modern Pentathlon. He was a good athlete and swimmer. But, knew nothing of pistol shooting, fencing or show jumping. I was no sportsman, but had grown up with horses and done some fencing. So, he asked for tips. And, asked another friend about shooting. From these slim pointers, he worked with the team coach and became quite accomplished - and very quickly.
Frugality is admired. And, necessity (as they say) is the mother of invention. But often, too much is made of scarcity. The extreme being the romantic notion of the starving artist slaving in a garret and producing works of enduring social value.